Temperatures
in the Kiowa Drill Hole
by Shari Kelley
For several
years, I have been using an age-dating technique called apatite
fission-track thermochronology to study the uplift and erosional
history of the Colorado Front Range. Bob Raynolds asked me to apply
this technique to the sedimentary rocks encountered in the Kiowa
drillhole so that we could gain a better understanding of the source
of the sediments as the Front Range formed. Bob and I chose some
sandstones from the Kiowa core for fission-track analysis. In addition,
we have sampled core from a well in Castle Pines.
A piece of
information that is very useful in interpreting fission-track data
is the temperature distribution in the well. Temperature data in
boreholes are also helpful in looking at the hydrology of an area.
Temperatures generally increase with increasing depth in the earth
as heat from deep inside the earth escapes. The geothermal gradient
is a measure of how rapidly the temperature increases as a function
of depth. Because the Denver Basin area is currently relatively
quiet in terms of volcanic and earthquake activity, one might expect
the average geothermal gradient to be about 30 degrees C/km. This
means that, on average, the temperature increases 30 degrees C for
every kilometer drilled into the Denver Basin. The Kiowa drillhole
bottomed out at about 0.67 km, so the temperature should increase
about 20 degrees C between the earth's surface and the bottom of
the well.
However, as
you might expect, nature is not that simple. Water flowing through
sedimentary rocks rearranges the temperature distribution in a basin,
as illustrated in the diagram below. Aquifers, such as the Fox Hills
Sandstone, are porous rock units that permit water to move through
the earth fairly easily. Near the mountain front, where rain and
snowmelt from the mountains enters the aquifer, the water seeps
downward, cooling the rocks. Thus, near the mountain front in the
recharge area, the geothermal gradient is below average. The water
moves down and is heated by thermal energy escaping from the earth.
If the heated water is brought back toward the surface at a place
where the aquifer reappears on the other side of the basin, the
geothermal gradient is above average in the discharge area.
Figure 1 -
Click for enlarged diagram.
The pattern
of low geothermal gradient near the western mountain front and high
geothermal gradient on the eastern margin of the basin on the plains
has been well documented adjacent to the Rocky Mountains in Canada.
This pattern has not been documented in the Denver Basin, largely
due to a lack of data. Some temperature data exist for an area north
of Denver known as the Wattenburg thermal anomaly, a zone of elevated
geothermal gradient, but that's another story. Very little thermal
data is available for the part of the basin south of Denver. We
could not pass up the chance to measure the temperatures in the
Kiowa drillhole!
Temperatures
in the Kiowa well were measured about 24 hours after the last section
of core had been extracted from the well and about an hour after
the geophysical logs were run. Drilling a well disturbs the ambient
temperatures of the rocks. Fluids used during drilling heat up the
upper section of a hole and cool the deeper portions of a well.
Consequently, immediately after drilling, the temperatures in the
borehole are out of thermal equilibrium and it can take up to year
for the temperatures to return to "normal." Although the
well was very much out of thermal equilibrium, we decided to log
the well immediately after drilling because the well was going to
be plugged back to 800 feet, and we wanted to get some idea of the
deeper temperatures. The first log of the well was measured by taking
readings every 5 meters using a calibrated thermistor attached to
about 2,500 meters of cable. The thermistor was lowered using a
hand crank. Data from the top 560 meters were collected inside the
drill pipe and in open hole below that point. The drill pipe was
left in the hole above the top of the Fox Hills Sandstone to keep
the hole from collapsing during logging. The fluid level in the
hole was about 15 meters below the ground surface at the time of
logging.
The hole was
completed to a depth of 244 meters (800 feet) in late April 1999.
The upper part of the well was re-logged approximately three months
after the initial logging run using a truck-mounted system operated
by two researchers from Southern Methodist University. Data were
collected every 0.1 meters. The water level in the hole was around
100 meters at the time of second log.
The temperature
and geothermal gradient data from the two logging runs are shown
in Figure 2. The temperature data from an April 1999 run are surprisingly
smooth. Fluids moving around at the base of the drill pipe caused
the rather large disturbance at 560 meters (1,837 feet). The truck-mounted
logging system has a hard time equilibrating in air, so there is
an offset in the temperatures measured in July 1999 at the water
table. Note that, below the water table, the temperatures have decreased
3 degrees C in the upper part of the well since the April run. Thermal
equilibrium was returning!
Figure 2 -
Click for enlarged diagram.
The geothermal
gradient plot as a function of depth is rather interesting. An average
gradient of 30 degrees C/km is shown as a dashed line for reference.
Notice that there are some sections of the hole where the interval
geothermal gradient is above 30 degrees C/km and other sections
where the gradient is below the average value. These deviations
from the average value are, in part, related to the type of rocks
present in each section.
Heat flow,
which is a gauge of the amount of thermal energy coming out of the
earth, is calculated by multiplying geothermal gradient by thermal
conductivity. Each rock type has a different thermal conductivity,
a measure of how well a material conducts heat. Rocks that are rich
in quartz, like sandstone, have a high thermal conductivity, indicating
that heat readily passes through sandstone. Rocks that are rich
in clay or organic materials, like shale and coal, have low thermal
conductivity, meaning that heat passes less readily through these
intervals. If the heat flow is constant throughout a drillhole (i.e.,
water is not flowing up or down the hole), then it stands to reason
that low-conductivity shale intervals will have a higher geothermal
gradient compared high-conductivity sandstone intervals. For example,
the gradient jumps from about 30 to 50 degrees C/km at 220 meters.
This jump roughly corresponds to an interval in the D1 sedimentary
rocks that contains many low thermal conductivity coal layers. Also,
note the high geothermal gradient associated with the clay-rich
paleosol on the most recent log of the well. The correspondence
of rock type with geothermal gradient is likely to become more clear
as the well reaches equilibrium.
Back
to top
|